Editorial Standards
Corrections Policy
We want you to trust what you read on LifeQuestioning. When we make a factual mistake, we fix it openly. This page explains how to tell us about an error and how our team handles it.
Our Commitment to Accuracy
LifeQuestioning publishes reflective articles that explore big life questions. Writers choose the topic and write the piece. Even though much of that writing is perspective and self-reflection rather than hard facts, we still care about getting factual details right: names, dates, statistics, references, quotes, and any claim presented as fact.
When a published article has a factual error or something becomes outdated, we want to fix it quickly and openly. This policy explains how you can tell us, and what happens after you do.
What Counts as a Correction
We treat the following as correctable issues: factual errors (incorrect names, dates, figures, or events), misquotes or misattributed sources, broken or wrong references and links, and information that was accurate before but has since become outdated.
Please note that our reflective questions, interpretations, and perspectives are not factual claims. Different readers may reasonably disagree with a viewpoint, and a difference of opinion is not, by itself, a factual error. We welcome that feedback too, but we handle it as reader feedback rather than a correction.
How to Report an Error
If you spot something that needs correcting, please contact us through our Contact form and include as much of the following as you can:
- The article title and, ideally, the link (URL).
- The exact sentence or section that seems incorrect.
- What you believe is correct, and — where possible — a reliable source we can check.
- Whether the issue is a factual error or information that has simply become outdated.
How We Review and Respond
Every correction request is reviewed by a LifeQuestioning admin. We aim to acknowledge genuine reports within a few business days and to verify the claim against reliable sources before making any change.
If we confirm the error, an admin updates the published article as soon as reasonably possible. We do not rewrite a writer's topic or viewpoint to settle a disagreement. If we cannot verify a change, or the content is perspective rather than fact, we treat that as feedback, not a correction.
How We Mark Corrections and Updates
For minor fixes such as typos, spelling, or formatting, we correct the text quietly without a formal note.
For meaningful factual corrections or substantive updates, we update the article and refresh its "last updated" date so readers can see the content has been revised. Where a change materially affects the meaning of a published piece, we aim to make that clear rather than silently rewriting history.
Contact
The fastest way to reach us about a correction is our Contact form. We read every message and treat accuracy reports as a priority.
Last updated: September 5, 2026.